So with the help of Cadalyst, a benchmark produced by the people at the website of the same name, both 2D and 3D performance is tested (along with I/O and CPU, but that isn’t needed here). Some of SPEC’s benchmarks on the following page take a look at CAD performance, but AutoCAD is left out. Autodesk AutoCAD 2016 (Cadalyst 2015 5.5b) If anyone out there has suggestions on other video encode tests I could include that might make better use of AMD’s graphics cards, please holler. As I like to say, it really pays to understand your workload, and right now, Premiere Pro works real well on Quadro. Adobe Premiere Pro WebQuickly Jump To: Processor (CPU) Video Card (GPU) Memory (RAM) Storage. NVIDIA goes, the ~$400 P2000 performed almost as well as the $620 WX 7100. Adobe Photoshop CC 2018 Review: Perfecting the Best. Overall, WX 3100 performance is great for its price point within AMD’s own lineup. PugetBench for Premiere Pro now uploads results to our Online Database Step 1: Get the Plugin Find it on Adobe Exchange Free version is suitable for personal use. If you look at the two Quadros here, there was a point of ceased returns on the 4K encode, but huge gains could still be seen in the music video project on the faster card, thanks to its thorough use of GPU accelerated filters. Or, if you are using two GPUs, they both should be identical to the other.) By the way, you stated that your system's discrete GPU has 4GB of VRAM. Unlike in GPU rendering, where great scaling between GPUs can be easily seen (as evidenced on the previous page with the ProRender tests), figuring out the perks of a faster graphics card in video encoding can be tough. (As of Premiere Pro CC 2017, GPU acceleration will only function for the primary GPU - the one which your monitor is connected to - and will not let you manually select the other GPU.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |